The risk from dead bodies after disasters due to natural hazards is misunderstood by many professionals and the media. Even local or international health workers are often misinformed and contribute to the spread of unfounded rumours about outbreaks and epidemics. Dead bodies from natural disasters generally do not cause epidemics. The risk of disease from dead bodies is real only in cases where the deceased has died of a highly infectious disease or has died in an area where such infectious disease is endemic. Even then, the risk of disease transmission to a trained body-handler is low.
Local officials and journalists say there is a risk to the public of disease from dead bodies. Are they correct?
July 07, 2021 / / in Care & Medicine, Death / with 1 comment /
Related Posts:
Local officials and journalists say there is a risk to the public of disease from dead bodies. Are they correct?- Do dead bodies cause epidemics?
- Is spraying bodies with disinfectant or lime powder useful?
- What are the health risks for the public?
- Should mass graves be used to speed up the disposal of dead bodies?
Best supplements for fertility
ReplyDeleteMicronutrients, commonly referred to as vitamins and minerals, are given as part of fertility treatments to help people increase their chances of getting pregnant.
The number of micronutrients a woman consumes may be significant, according to a 2019 systematic review, even if there haven't been many large-scale research on the subject. The researchers found that vitamin supplementation had a negligible beneficial effect on the time it took for women to become pregnant.
The success of infertile couples may be helped by vitamin D. Another study from 2017 discovered that vitamin D may help in conception. A 2017 study found that women who are at risk for vitamin D deficiency are less likely to become pregnant and give birth to a child. Read more here